Dark Runescape Wiki

Hi there. If you're interested in editing, why not make an account? It is fast, free, and easy, and provides you with new abilities, such as the ability to hold a watchlist, and to move pages. Please make an account today!

And if you already have an account, you should log in.

READ MORE

Dark Runescape Wiki

Please use this page to discuss pages that have been labeled for deletion.

hi

I think we should keep Junhalestone because it is a great example of breaking some rules. And thats what DRSW is all about--right?

yes[]

yes i think juhalestone should be kept if any should be deleted it should be R4ng3d 5 as its about a player who hasnt done anything of significance so its just advertising and vandalism

I think it should be deleted, as most of it isn't true. He was actually hacked by someone who used his account to advertise said site. Template:Signatures/Mage K01

L0v3LadyGaga[]

Not famous, originally could be intended for "self advertisement"

Sub367 14:30, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Doesnt provide any useful info Kotorone1 01:37, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

a useless page User:Yakonani

IT'S EMPTY! — Leetwizard (talk) 15:20, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Mexicans![]

This page has absolutely nothing to do with the DRSW. In fact, it could even be seen as racist. Do I need another reason? I vote to have this page removed as soon as possible. Eevables 06:48, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

This page needs to go Kotorone1 01:38, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

i have forever hated ths page glad to see it go User:Yakonani

Jonah Gale[]

It does not exactly look lagit. But who cares, looks like it could be true (I have not seen anything to the contrary) and it sure looks like he is breaking the rules, Account sharing, promoting glitched items, ect. last I checked this was the place for teh sort of stuff like that.

Keep Junhalestone![]

We should keep Junhalestone. He is very factual about breaking Rule 11. It even says he has 60.0 blackmarks. Very factual. Should keep.


(UnevenTank2000 02:31, March 19, 2011 (UTC))

Delete PowerBot[]

The article PowerBot has no significance, and it breaks the rules of the wiki as it is essentially an advertisement for an illegal macroing program. Anyone in favor post below. Chilled Socks 02:51, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Delete sixfeetunder[]

I suggest that we delete "Sixfeetunder". It's a small small page wich I have never heard of. Adding info would help, Although you would need more info. — Leetwizard (talk) 15:19, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose - Sixfeetunder was the person originally responsible for the discovery of the Party hat duplication glitch, and therefore would be an integral part of this wiki. I'll work on expanding the article ASAP. -- Chilled Socks 20:16, March 23, 2012 (UTC)